TheQuran.com
Linguistic Analysis · argument Classical sources

Al-An‘ām 6:139

The verse

6:139
وَقَالُوا۟ مَا فِى بُطُونِ هَٰذِهِ ٱلْأَنْعَٰمِ خَالِصَةٌ لِّذُكُورِنَا وَمُحَرَّمٌ عَلَىٰٓ أَزْوَٰجِنَا ۖ وَإِن يَكُن مَّيْتَةً فَهُمْ فِيهِ شُرَكَآءُ ۚ سَيَجْزِيهِمْ وَصْفَهُمْ ۚ إِنَّهُۥ حَكِيمٌ عَلِيمٌ ١٣٩
And they say: That which is in the bellies of such cattle is reserved for our males and is forbidden to our wives; but if it be born dead, then they (all) may be partakers thereof. He will reward them for their attribution (of such ordinances unto Him). Lo, He is Wise, Aware. — Marmaduke Pickthall

The issue

In the current Arabic Qur’ān the word khālis. a (“specially reserved”) is used in the

feminine, while the word muh. arram (“forbidden”) is used in the masculine. The question then becomes, why did these two descriptions, “specially reserved” and “forbidden,” come in two forms of the language—one in feminine and the other in masculine?

The scholars have given various linguistic reasons for writing, “specially reserved” in

the feminine:

• What is in the belly of these cattle is feminine, just like the mother cow. The word

“what” refers to the embryos.

• In Arabic, the last letter in the word khālis. a, which makes it feminine, is for

hyperbole.

The scholars have said that the reason the word “forbidden” is written in the masculine

form is because it refers to the word “what,” so “it was mentioned in reference to that

word, but, had the meaning been considered, it should have read as feminine”.

It seems that Ibn Mas‘ūd saw a defect in the verse, so he wrote in his version of the

Qur’ān the word khālis. (“specially reserved”) as masculine.

It is worth noting that whenever the Muslim scholars encountered a written linguistic

error, they came up with explanations and justifications for the error. This justification

does not reinforce the rhetoric of the Qur’ān but shows arbitrariness in the use of the

language, as well as a skewing of the text.

The Qur’ān’s editing committee (‘Uthmān’s committee) could have saved the interpreters a tremendous effort had they followed the codex of Ibn Mas‘ūd, which reads khālis (“specially reserved”) in the masculine form.

Arabic text of this item

في الآية جاءت لفظةُ <خالِصَة> بصيغة التأنيث، و<مُحَرَّم> بصيغة التذكير. فلماذا جاءت الصفتان بصيغتين مختلفتين: مرة بالتّأنيث ومرة بالتذكير.

طرح المفسرون تعليلات لغوية لسبب تأنيث «خَالِصَة»، منها:

• أن ما في بطون الأنعام مؤنث، مثلُها مثل الأنعام؛

• أو أن <مَا> تشير الى الأجنة؛

• أو أن التاء في <خَالِصَة> هى للمبالغة.

وقال المفسرون إن سبب اختيار التذكير في <مُحَرَّم> يرجع إلى أن المفردة تعود إلى <مَا>، «فذكرت على اللفظ ولو راعى المعنى لقال: ومُحَرّمة».

ويبدو أن عبد الله بن مسعود رأي خللاً في الآية، فدون في نسخته للقرآن: «خالِصٌ» (بالتذكير).

الجدير بالملاحظة أنه عندما يصادف العلماء المسلمون لحناً لغوياً، فإنهم يقدمون التبريرات والتسويغات، لكن هذا لا يعزز من بيان القرآن، بل يظهر التعسف في اللغة وليّ النص، وكان بوسع محررو القرآن أن يوفروا على الشارحين، في المثال الذي نحن بصدده الآن، عناءً كبيراً لو أخذوا بقراءة ابن مسعود: «خالِصٌ» (بالتذكير).

Sources cited

  1. الرازي 13: 219.
  2. القرطبي 9: 46-47.
  3. الطبري 9: 586.
  4. الزمخشري 2: 403.